Like Junkies Nation on Facebook Follow Junkies Nation on Twitter Subscribe to the Junkies Nation RSS Feed
HOME NEWS MMORPG GAMING MOBA GEEK CULTURE

Daglar’s Hopes for RIFT PvP: 5 vs. 5 Matches & More

By on Sep 20, 2013 at 9:31 am, in Article, RIFT  |  Comments: 10 comments

conquestex_title

For a few months now, Daglar has tried to keep an open line of communication with RIFT‘s PvP community. He’s discussed his honest thoughts on world PvP a time or two, and didn’t hesitate to express his opinions on why multiboxing in Warfronts saw its swift demise a month ago. He even has taken the time to add additional alternate-mode Warfronts to the game on his days off. Daglar wants to see PvP in RIFT more fun for everyone. The real question is… how?

Yesterday he took to the PvP forums again and posted a few long-winded but awesome thoughts in this particular thread, where players had been outlining and collecting a bunch of suggestions and ideas for the development team on what improvements they’d like to see regarding PvP in RIFT. He deluged some interesting info, and as always, was honest with his thoughts.

 

PvP Dimensions

Many PvPers had hoped we’d see the arrival of PvP dimensions in the 2.4 update, but the feature isn’t quite ready yet. Daglar reiterated this fact and stressed that PvP dimensions, when they’re first released, “will be fairly bare bones. The intent with features like this is to test the waters and see how many people actually use it, then build on success where possible.” Initially, players will be able to create a PvP deathmatch setup within a PvP dimension and that’s about it.

He also mentioned that the feature will not launch with a queue. Players will have to join the dimensions manually where they have access to do so. If the feature is successful, the team may find a way to add a queue. There will also be no favor/prestige rewards for taking part in PvP dimension matches. Contests may be a possibility, however.

 

Conquest

Daglar doesn’t view Conquest as a “flop”, but he does admit that it could be better and that he’d like to see additional maps added in the future. The team has started talking about what they’d like to change in the next implementation of Conquest:

“We’ve started laying the groundwork for the next version of CQ – in fact we’ve got a couple of layouts we are persueing. As always I won’t promise a release date – but I’d /like/ to get one out in 2.5.

Something that isn’t as player facing is just how the back end of the CQ stuff works. The system was built to not be as extensible as some of our other scripting. Pithos recently took some of his own free time (a while back actually), and extended the functionality so we can actually change up the game mode more.

Modifying the existing Stillmoor map is unlikely at this point in time as it would be more of a rats nest to update it than to simply build a new one with a new ruleset. The other thing to consider about Conquest is the intent from our end is to not heavily tax our art team and require them to build new areas. That was actually the driving reason why the map takes place in Stillmoor. By doing this, we can actually continue to produce the content we need to produce going forward (like 3.0).

For the next round of CQ we are looking at using the following mechanics:

Resources exist in the world – either in a few set locations, or randomly spawning locations.
Resources are carry objects – like you are used to, and may be taken from enemies.

Nodes exist in the world – either owned by teams or general nodes.

Resources must be taken to a node and successfully channeled/used on the node in order to increment your teams points.

Depending on node placement, and resource placement, this means that teams must attempt to gather resources, transport those resources to locations, and to stop enemy teams from transporting resources to the other locations.

No beating on walls, no beating on extractors – just teams attempting to dominate locations and control their supply lines – and deny enemies supply lines.”

The team is also talking about allowing any players that are level 50 or above to enter Conquest.

conquest_map

 

Matchmaking System

Daglar mentioned that Trion would like to redo the current PvP matchmaking system. The groundwork for such a redo started months ago, in fact.

“Under the new system users will be placed onto teams based on their rating and the system will attempt to fill in slots evenly based on ratings. In effect, mercenary will be in effect at all times – your base faction is not considered at all – it is effectively Red Vs Blue – though we are not going to re-theme all warfronts or re-script them – the Mercenary message will still pop up etc.”

 

Competitive/Arena PvP

More than once, Daglar has mentioned the fact that RIFT isn’t an ideal game for arena-style PvP matches in his opinion. It seems he has been talking to engineers about the possibility of instanced 5 vs. 5 team matches, however:

“Ultra caveat for what I’m about to say next – this is in no way a binding contract and I’m most certainly not telling you a game update number for this but I am actively talking to engineers about the following:

5v5 – Getting code support so that we can in fact set a warfront to 5 v 5 only mode and not in the random queue. You must be 5 players, you must be the leader of the 5 players to enter the queue. 5 v 5 mode does not award favor and prestige. 5 v 5 mode tracks a rating on the back end and there might be some potential to give either a title or special border to the top percentage of users. This mode would not be active all the time. It would start as a special event / contest.”

The team’s always looking to add in additional Warfront maps, as these can be used for multiple team sizes in the future.

 

Class Balance

At this point in the game, redesigning souls/classes from the ground up isn’t really possible, but the development team is looking to focus heavily on re-encouraging players to use hybrid specs again instead of pure 61-point specs all of the time. If done right, this would give players more options for PvP (and PvE, of course) without destroying balance.

 

PvP Gear/Gameplay Requirements

Daglar seems open to ideas regarding how to make PvP progression not quite as gear-based, but isn’t quite sure how to tackle the issue exactly. He did mention in a later post that if Trion does add in 5 vs. 5 matches, gear progression won’t be the central reward for taking part in these matches. “It isn’t about another gear grind,” he said. “It is intended to be about going out and showing folks who is best – and changing your target portrait for the top percentages is exactly one of the things we discussed.”

He doesn’t seem quite as willing to budge on the team’s stance regarding encouraging players to participate in more than one type of gameplay style in RIFT (the Conquest PvE “requirement”, for example).

In a different forum thread yesterday, Daglar touched on the issue regarding Mercenary gear being essentially useless now:

Originally posted by Daglar (Source)


To be very blunt, we’ve made this same sort of change in the past and not seen this sort of large scale response.

There are a lot of good arguments being made on the forums and elsewhere about a lack of our communication on this specific subject, and the fact that many users have only been in game for a few months – as opposed to the situation we were in before where we did not have a massive influx of new top end players.

Because of this, we are in fact doing something about it. Mercenary gear is having a recipe added so that you can consume it and gain favor from it. This will allow anyone with mercenary gear to effectively trade it in for Freelancer gear.

You can expect this to go live in next week’s normally scheduled hotfix.

Laura Hardgrave

Laura Hardgrave

Laura is the Editor-in-Chief for Junkies Nation. When she's not writing long editorials or fighting apostrophe errors, she enjoys exploring multiple MMORPGs, getting inspiration for more long editorials, distracting big snarly things for her friends, and writing LGBT science fiction/fantasy.
SPEAK FRIEND AND DISQUS WITH US
  • Issachaar

    I actually really hope we get arena-style PvP in Rift. The challenge for the design team would be to not design the game around it.

  • George Lolas

    The PvP dimensions will be a great feature. Add the mechanics, leave to the players the designs and how they would like the matches to flow. I have built a pvp arena myself (Bloodiron server, dimension name: Arena Pool of Suffering, for anyone that wants to take a look :P) and I am looking forward to pvp dimensions.

    The whole arena thing is difficult to be implemented in Rift for one reason: Souls. There are so many combinations that is very difficult to balance each soul and each combination so everyone has the same chances to win. In WoW that there are arenas, I remember that from day 1 until today there are people who complain about balance issues etc. You cannot balance things for massive PvP and Arenas at the same time. I don’t think you can. I hope they add arenas sometime though, more features, more ways to have fun :)

  • scotti

    The healers are too strong and do there job way to well. 1 healer shouldnt be able to keep 5 people up at one time nor should they be able to tank an entire team at one time and live through it. the healing spec is out of hand in pvp.

  • http://www.friv2friv3friv4.com/ friv 2 friv 3 friv 4

    I actually really hope we get arena-style PvP in Rift. The challenge for
    the design team would be to not design the game around it.

  • Pingback: Conquest: Steppes of Infinity Coming Soon | RIFT Junkies - RiftJunkies.com - An Official Rift: Planes of Telara Fansite

  • anonymousturkey

    Why no rewards or queue for 5v5 or dimention pvp? That is a good way to set it up for failure.
    Something to consider for pvp dimentions is making it a dueling mode.
    In other words, you queue for a dimention duel instead of a team fight. Best out of 5 wins. I have seen this done successfuly in several games, such as dc universe.

ARCHIVES